![]() 630 René-Lévesque Blvd. West Suite 1700 Montreal, Quebec H3B 1S6 Tel.: (514) 843-3777 Fax: (514) 843-6110 ![]() 390 Bay Street Suite 800 Toronto, Ontario M5H 2Y2 Tel.: (416) 366-4555 Fax: (416) 366-6110 |
MAJOR CHANGES TO THE QUEBEC COMPANIES ACT ON THE WAY2009-10-13
While the last significant amendments date back to the 1980s, a major reform of the Quebec Companies Act (hereinafter the “Act”) was introduced on October 7, 2009, when Quebec’s Minister of Finance tabled Bill 63, entitled the Business Corporations Act (hereinafter “Bill 63”). The purpose of Bill 63 is to replace Part I and Directors One of the major amendments proposed by the legislator is the clarification of directors’ duties. Specifically, Bill 63 will incorporate the duties imposed on directors under the Civil Code. Moreover, the obligations of directors to act with prudence and diligence as well as with honesty and loyalty in the interest of the corporation are expressly set out in the new legislation. The legislator has provided additional information regarding these duties and has expanded the defence of reasonable diligence, notably in cases where directors rely in good faith on the report, opinion or information provided by an officer, a legal advisor, an accountant, or other expert retained by the corporation or a committee of the board of directors. The defence of reasonable diligence introduced under Bill 63 thus resembles that set out in the CBCA. Bill 63 also provides directors with a defence of reasonable diligence, similar to that provided by the CBCA, against liability for the issuing of shares and against liability towards employees. However, Bill 63 does not provide examples of diligent behaviours as does the CBCA, which include reliance on financial statements or the reports of other professionals. Furthermore, under Bill 63, the legislator confers on the courts the power to exonerate a director if it is of the opinion that the director acted reasonably and with honesty and loyalty and if it is in the interests of justice that the director be exonerated. How the courts will use this power remains to be seen. In addition, the new legislation sets out the conditions required for the indemnification of directors and officers against reasonable charges and expenses incurred in the exercise of their functions as well as the possibility for the corporation to take out insurance against the liability of its directors, officers, and other agents. Minority Shareholders
The interests of minority shareholders will be better protected under Bill 63, which provides for an action to force the corporation to redeem the shares of minority shareholders if they disagree with a major change to the structure or activities of the corporation. Bill 63 also provides a remedy, similar to the oppression remedy set out in the CBCA, to counter abuses of power and inequities committed by the corporation against minority shareholders. Bill 63 contains a few differences, however, most notably in that it provides a recourse against threatened abuse or injustice, although it does not provide any recourse for abuse or injustice towards creditors. Bill 63 also confers upon the courts the power to order the payment of extrajudicial fees. The interests of minority shareholders will be better protected under Bill 63, which provides for an action to force the corporation to redeem the shares of minority shareholders if they disagree with a major change to the structure or activities of the corporation. Bill 63 also provides a remedy, similar to the oppression remedy set out in the CBCA, to counter abuses of power and inequities committed by the corporation against minority shareholders. Bill 63 contains a few differences, however, most notably in that it provides a recourse against threatened abuse or injustice, although it does not provide any recourse for abuse or injustice towards creditors. Bill 63 also confers upon the courts the power to order the payment of extrajudicial fees. Modernization and Simplified Administration Bill 63 simplifies administrative procedures, replacing the administrative formalities currently in place with more flexible rules. For example, a sole shareholder will have the option of not electing a board of directors. In order to modernize Application The transitional provisions of Bill 63 provide that companies governed by Part I of the current Act will have a delay of five years from the date the new legislation comes into force to be continued under the new Act. However, companies governed by Bill 63 was tabled on October 7, 2009, and is currently expected to come into force in 2011. CAUTION: The information contained in the Updates and Publications found on the NPM website does not constitute a legal opinion and must not be construed as such. It is important to always consult a lawyer who is a member of the Bar or Law Society of the relevant jurisdiction with regard to all the information contained in the present Updates and Publications. One should never take measures or fail to take measures based on the information contained in the Updates and/or Publications found on this website without first having consulted a lawyer who is a member of the Bar or Law Society of the relevant jurisdiction. All material is copyrighted by Nicholl Paskell-Mede and may not be reproduced in any form for commercial purposes without the express written consent of Nicholl Paskell-Mede. Anyone seeking to link this site from any external website must seek the consent of Nicholl Paskell-Mede by sending an e-mail to messages@npm.ca. |